Re: [2.4.23-pre3] Possible bug in fs/buffer.c

From: Andreas Schwab
Date: Mon Sep 08 2003 - 11:06:56 EST


Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Llu, 2003-09-08 at 16:42, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> It's neither ugly, nor bogus. The only 100% reliable way to assign the
>> maximum value to an unsigned integer is to use -1.
>
> Its not 100% reliable either 8).

Could you please elaborate? Casting -1 to an unsigned type is guaranteed
to yield the maximum value for that type, at least since C89, but I think
even K&R C did get it right.

Andreas.

--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@xxxxxxx
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/