Re: [CFT][PATCH] new scheduler policy

[Alan Cox]

On Maw, 2003-09-02 at 15:25, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > in the best position to decide which process is more important. 
> > That's why I proposed kernel based approach.
> 
> Tasks can easily report their interactivity needs/nice value.
> X are already depend on clients not trying to screw each other,
> so thats okay.

There is a slight problem with a kernel based approach too - the app may
be remote. 

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/