Re: [PATCH] Re: today's futex changes

[Hugh Dickins]

On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > And save a few bytes and improve debuggability
> > by uninlining the top-level futex_wake, futex_requeue, futex_wait.
> 
> Fair point about about debuggability, but does it really save bytes to
> uninline these called-once functions?

It saved about 50 with whatever 2.96 I'm using on this machine, but I
didn't try other gccs; it's probably added about that back in kallsyms...

Hugh

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/