Re: kernel header separation

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 03:16:04PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> On Fri Sep 05, 2003 at 03:41:54PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > i think all these _t types are ugly ;-(
> 
> They may be ugly, but they are standardized and have very 
> precise meanings defined by ISO C99, which is a very good
> thing for code interoperability...

__u8 has a very precise meaning defined by Linux.  If you're including
a Linux header. that's what you need to worry about.

-- 
"It's not Hollywood.  War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death.  I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/