Re: [PATCH] Use -fno-unit-at-a-time if gcc supports it

[Jeff Garzik]

On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 07:27:15PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> I'm not sure that is that good an idea. When I was still hacking 
> TCP I especially moved some stuff out-of-line in the fast path to avoid 
> register pressure. Otherwise gcc would inline rarely used sub functions 
> and completely mess up the register allocation in the fast path.
> Of course just a call alone messes up the registers somewhat because
> of its clobbers, but a full inlining is usually worse.
[...]
> I suspect that is true for a lot of core kernel code - everything
> that is worth inlining is already inlined and for the rest it doesn't matter.

Definitely , agreed.  In fact, we are moving in the opposite direction:
looking into what we can un-inline...


> On the other hand a lot of driver code seems to be written without
> manual consideration for inline. For that it may be worth it. But then
> I would consider core kernel code to be more important than driver
> code.

Modern network drivers seem fairly aware of it ;-)

> Also I fear cross module inlining would expose a lot of latent bugs
> (missing barriers etc.) when the optimizer becomes more aggressive. 
> I'm not saying this would be a bad thing, just that it may be a lot 
> of work to fix (both for compiler and kernel people)

Agreed.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/