Re: 2.4.22aa1
From: Marc-Christian Petersen
Date: Tue Sep 02 2003 - 13:40:31 EST
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 04:02, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
Hi Andrea,
> Only in 2.4.22aa1: 20_sched-o1-fixes-10
> Only in 2.4.22pre7aa1: 20_sched-o1-fixes-9
> Changed the CHILD_PENALTY logic to be centered around
> 50%. From Kurt Garloff.
the changes 's/CHILD_PENALTY/CHILD_INHERITANCE' and "s/PARENT_PENALTIY//' are
really awfull for desktops. If I change child_inheritance from 60 to 95 and
reintroduce the logic with parent_penaltiy, it's alot smooter under load.
I think these logics should be #ifdef'ed with CONFIG_DESKTOP, no?
ciao, Marc
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 04:02, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
Hi Andrea,
> Only in 2.4.22aa1: 20_sched-o1-fixes-10
> Only in 2.4.22pre7aa1: 20_sched-o1-fixes-9
> Changed the CHILD_PENALTY logic to be centered around
> 50%. From Kurt Garloff.
the changes 's/CHILD_PENALTY/CHILD_INHERITANCE' and "s/PARENT_PENALTIY//' are
really awfull for desktops. If I change child_inheritance from 60 to 95 and
reintroduce the logic with parent_penaltiy, it's alot smooter under load.
I think these logics should be #ifdef'ed with CONFIG_DESKTOP, no?
ciao, Marc
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/