Re: CONFIG_64_BIT

From: Jeff Garzik
Date: Tue Sep 02 2003 - 13:22:09 EST

Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you?"
Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: 2.6-test4 Traditional pty and devfs"
In reply to: Matthew Wilcox: "CONFIG_64_BIT"
Next in thread: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: CONFIG_64_BIT"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Matthew Wilcox wrote:

What do people think of CONFIG_64_BIT? It saves us from using

Yes! Please!

Though I would of course make it CONFIG_64BIT ;-)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Matthew Wilcox wrote:

What do people think of CONFIG_64_BIT? It saves us from using

Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you?"
Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: 2.6-test4 Traditional pty and devfs"
In reply to: Matthew Wilcox: "CONFIG_64_BIT"
Next in thread: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: CONFIG_64_BIT"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]