Re: [PATCH] RFC: kills consistent_dma_mask

[Krzysztof Halasa]

"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Umm, come on, this is inaccurate.

I tried to make it accurate. I might be missing something, though.
What exactly do you think is inaccurate?

>  But this is unrelated to
> the consistent DMA issues.

Hmm... What do you mean?

BTW: consistent_dma_mask and dma_mask names are misleading: they are
(in theory) related to allocation vs mapping requests mainly -
the consistent vs non-consistent thing is secondary.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa, B*FH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/