Re: 2.6.0-test4: uhci-hcd.c: "host controller process error", slab call trace

[Duncan Sands]

> My feeling is that a reasonably large change may end up being the best
> thing to do.  In particular, we probably only need to have one QH per
> queue, instead of one for each URB.  But it'll be a while before that
> stuff gets done.

But won't that result in starvation of some endpoints in favour of those
with vast numbers of urbs queued on them?  At the moment the per-urb
QHs mean that the hc works on only one urb per endpoint before moving
on to the next endpoint.

Ciao,

Duncan.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/