Re: /proc/ioports overrun patch

[john stultz]

On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 06:30, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:

> If so, I would prefer to have a fix which outputs the full resource
> information. For that we would need seq_file().

I have a patch that converts /proc/interrupts to use seq_file as well,
however it would be much cleaner if Randy's backport of the "single"
interface went in first  

http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0308.3/0296.html

Are you planning on taking that patch? Or should I just resend my patch
w/o it?

thanks
-john

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/