Re: We have ethtool_ops, any thoughts on miitool_ops?

[David T Hollis]

David S. Miller wrote:

> On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:50:17 +0200
> Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  
>
> > On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 04:14, David T Hollis wrote:
> >    
> >
> > > If a driver is converted to use ethtool_ops, it does not seem to have 
> > > the ability to support mii-tool any longer.  RedHat uses mii-tool to 
> > > check for link before running dhclient so that you don't have to wait 
> > > forever for dhclient to timeout if the connection is down (laptops, 
> > > etc). 
> > >      
> > this is legacy; the road to the future for this is ethtool + the link
> > status change notification stuff 
> >    
>
> Besides, the original claim is false.  You can still support all
> the other ioctls however you want, even the MII ones, after
> enabling ethtool_ops in a driver.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>  
Thanks for the pointer.  I didn't realize I could still have the old 
ioctl handler and just not worry about the ethool portion of it. 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/