Re: [PATCH] bad definition of cpus_complement

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 11:54:52AM -0400, Joe Korty wrote:
> One of the definitions of cpus_complement is broke.  Also, cpus_complement is
> the only cpus_* definition which operates in-place rather than in (dst,src)
> form.  I will submit a patch to convert if there is interest.

The definition is fine (see other responses), but the inconsistent
argument convention might be worth shoring up to match the others.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/