Re: [PATCH] Nick's scheduler policy v8

From: Nick Piggin
Date: Thu Aug 28 2003 - 06:10:44 EST




Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:

On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 10:49, Nick Piggin wrote:


No big changes, this one takes some of the steepness out of the
timeslice curve and fixes a bug with child priorities which
might or might not help startup times. Probably no point doing
any benchmarks on it if they've been done on v7.


I've been playing with it for a while and, from what I've seen until
date, I must say it makes X feel smooth (even when X not reniced,
although I've reniced it to -20). However, it still feels a little bit
slower when forking new processes under heavy load. I'll do some
benchmarking and will post numbers here.
Thanks!


Hi Felipe,
Sorry I can't reply directly to you. Something thinks I'm spam...
Anyway, thanks for all your good feedback. The slower fork response
is something I haven't been able to get quite right without causing
kernel compiles to slow things down _too_ much. I have a few more
ideas though.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/