RE: Lockless file reading

[David Schwartz]

> That was my original plan, to just rely on such kernel behaviour. I just
> don't know if it's such a good idea to rely on that, especially if I
> want to keep my program portable. I'll probably fallback to that anyway
> if my checksumming ideas won't work.

	If you only have one writer, why not have the writer update an MD5 checksum
in the file along with the datawrite? If the reader sees an invalid
checksum, it repeats the read. This is simple, elegant, and foolproof. The
only possible flaw would be if you found two data sets with the same MD5
checksum. The instant fame would be well worth the inconvenience. ;)

	DS


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/