Re: [PATCH 2.4.23-pre1] /proc/ikconfig support

[Marcelo Tosatti]

On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 18:36:59 +0200 Marc-Christian Petersen
<m.c.p@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

| On Monday 25 August 2003 19:50, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
|
| Hi Marcelo,
|
| > Idea/Patch from Randy Dunlap including fixes/updates:
| > From: Daniele Bellucci <bellucda@xxxxxxxxxx>
| >     put_user() to return -EFAULT on error.
| > From: Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>
| >     Updated 'extract-ikconfig' script
| > From me:
| >     /proc/ikconfig should only be allowed if CONFIG_PROC_FS=y
| > Attached is /proc/ikconfig support.
...
|
| something not ok with this or do you just need some time to review it?
:)

> I have the same question about the seq_file "single" additions
> patch that I sent yesterday.... ???

The seq_file patch needs EXPORT_SYMBOL right?

And about ikconfig, hum, I'm not sure if I want that. Its nice, yes, but I
still wonder. You are free to convince me though: I think people usually
know what they compile in their kernels, dont they?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/