Re: [RFC][PATCH] Make cryptoapi non-optional?

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri Aug 15 2003 - 19:21:41 EST


Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm pretty sure there was never a time when entropy
> accounting wasn't racy let alone wrong, SMP or no (fixed in -mm, thank
> you).

Well is has been argued that the lack of locking in the random driver is a
"feature", adding a little more unpredictability.

Now I don't know if that makes sense or not, but the locking certainly has
a cost. If it doesn't actually fix anything then that cost becomes a
waste.

IOW: what bug does that locking fix?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/