Re: [RFC][PATCH] Make cryptoapi non-optional?

From: James Morris
Date: Fri Aug 15 2003 - 18:36:38 EST


On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Theodore Ts'o wrote:

> > d) not disable preemption for long stretches while hashing (a
> > limitation of cryptoapi)
>
> Sounds like a bug in CryptoAPI that should be fixed in CryptoAPI.

This is for the case of hashing from a per cpu context, which is an
inherently unsafe context for introducing schedule points. This is not
a crypto API specific problem.


- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/