Re: [PATCH] O16int for interactivity

[Mike Fedyk]

On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 01:49:06AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Changes:
> Waker is now kept track of.
> 
> Only user tasks have the bonus ceiling from uninterruptible sleep.
> 
> Preemption of tasks at the same level with twice as much timeslice has been 
> dropped as this is not necessary with timeslice granularity (may improve 
> performance of cpu intensive tasks).
> 
> Preemption of user tasks is limited to those in the interactive range; cpu 
> intensive non interactive tasks can run out their full timeslice (may also 
> improve cpu intensive performance)
> 
> Tasks cannot preempt their own waker.
> 
> Cleanups etc.

Con, given the problems reported, maybe each of these should be in a
different changeset (OXXint, etc...).

Seeing the large number of changes, compared to previous releases gave me a
pause on this patch.  So I waited a few minutes and there was a problem
report quickly.

Is there any way you can provide each change in a seperate patch, so we can
narrow down the problem patch? (I have a feeling that most of your changes will do a
lot of good)

Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/