Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle fixes for drm_agpsupport

[Eli Carter]

Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 11:43:40AM -0700, Philip Brown wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 07:47:11AM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> >
> > > ...
> > > Indeed I have.  And there is a reason that we have a policy at BitMover
> > > where "formatting changes" are prohibited and we make people redo their
> > > changesets until they get them right.
> > >
> > > In other words, you are welcome to write a revision control system
> > > which can look through the formatting changes and give you the semantic
> > > knowledge that you want.  We'd love to see how it is done and then do
> > > it in BitKeeper :)
> >
> > You should allow for ...
>
>
> Didn't you mean "in the SCM system I'm writing, I allow for ..."?
>
> Besides, your point is content specific.  People check things other than
> C code into BK.

I assume you can have content-specific validators run before a commit? 
(CVS can.) A validator could see that it was formatting only and mark it 
in someway perhaps?
But we've wandered _way_ OT at this point, and it's well past the point 
of diminishing returns...

Eli
--------------------. "If it ain't broke now,
Eli Carter           \                  it will be soon." -- crypto-gram
eli.carter(a)inet.com `-------------------------------------------------

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/