Re: Filesystem Tests

• Next message: Hans Reiser: "Re: [PATCH][TRIVIAL] Bugzilla bug # 1043 - help message for CONFIG_REISERFS_FS is outdated"
• Previous message: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: [PATCH] ide-disk.c rev 1.13 killed CONFIG_IDEDISK_STROKE"
• In reply to: Diego Calleja García: "Re: Filesystem Tests"
• Next in thread: Clemens Schwaighofer: "Re: Filesystem Tests"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Diego Calleja García wrote:

>El Wed, 6 Aug 2003 12:08:50 -0700 Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com> escribió:
>
>
>
>>But with servers, the larger your filesystem, the longer it will take to
>>fsck. And that is bad for uptime. Period.
>>
>>
>
>Sure. But Han's "don't benchmark ext2 because it's not an option" isn't
>a valid stament, at least to me.
>
>I'm not saying ext2 is the best fs on earth, but i *really* think
>it's a real option, and as such, it must be benchmarked.
>
>
>
>
Actually, I think it would be nice if Grant benchmarked it because it
shows the overhead of ext3's journaling, but it should be noted that it
is not a valid option for most servers.

-- 
Hans
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Hans Reiser: "Re: [PATCH][TRIVIAL] Bugzilla bug # 1043 - help message for CONFIG_REISERFS_FS is outdated"
• Previous message: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: [PATCH] ide-disk.c rev 1.13 killed CONFIG_IDEDISK_STROKE"
• In reply to: Diego Calleja García: "Re: Filesystem Tests"
• Next in thread: Clemens Schwaighofer: "Re: Filesystem Tests"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 22:00:38 EST