On Wed Aug 06, 2003 at 08:32:23PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Erik Andersen wrote:
>
> > > Can you please resend me the patch once its accepted in 2.6 ?
> > >
> > > Maybe we want to test it a while in -ac, also?
> >
> > Ok. Though it is being incorporated as part of a much larger
> > patch in 2.6. I suppose that will filter back into 2.4 when
> > it is ready,
>
> Hi Erik,
>
> I made init_idedisk_capacity() cleanup.
> Then I ported your patch and reworked it a bit.
>
> Could you take a look?
I like your improvements. The only concern I have is you
retained my use of do_div() intact. That needs to change since
it turns out that do_div() directly modifies the numerator
(violating the principle of least surprise). See the recent
thread on "do_div considered harmful". In that thread, Andries
mentions he has made a generic sectors_to_MB() function to
consolidate such things. which I think is a very good idea since
then this only has to be correct once. That would also let you
eliminate the somewhat ugly and not particularly obvious division
plus rounding (X - X/625 + 974)/1950 sequence from
idedisk_check_hpa_lba28(),
-Erik
-- Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/ --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 22:00:34 EST