Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two

From: Tomas Szepe (szepe@pinerecords.com)
Date: Tue Aug 05 2003 - 12:46:57 EST

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: i_blksize"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] revert to static = {0}"
In reply to: Patrick Mochel: "Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
Next in thread: Ducrot Bruno: "Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> [mochel@osdl.org]
>
> I can buy that. There are actually three levels of power management that
> we handle:
>
> - System Power Management (swsusp, CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP)
> - Device Power Management (kernel/pm.c, future driver model support)
> - CPU Power Management (cpufreq)
>
> SPM implies that DPM will be enabled, but both DPM and CPM can exist
> without SPM, and independently of each other. All of them would
> essentially fall under CONFIG_PM..

Ok, that makes a lot of sense.

> Would you willing to whip up a patch for the Kconfig entries?

Sure, I'll try to put something together so we have a patch to start
playing with.

-- 
Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: i_blksize"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] revert to static = {0}"
In reply to: Patrick Mochel: "Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
Next in thread: Ducrot Bruno: "Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 22:00:29 EST