Re: lk maintainers

From: Paul Mundt (lethal@linux-sh.org)
Date: Tue Aug 05 2003 - 08:52:27 EST

Next message: Maciej Soltysiak: "[PATCH] More C99 Initialisers in sound/*"
Previous message: Robert L. Harris: "Re: FINALLY caught a panic"
In reply to: Denis Vlasenko: "lk maintainers"
Next in thread: Matt Mackall: "kbuild (was Re: lk maintainers)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 03:36:03PM +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> This document is mailed to lkml regularly and will be modified
> whenever new victim wishes to be listed in it or someone can
> no longer devote his time to maintainer work.
>
Isn't this exactly what MAINTAINERS is for? What is the point of
having this lk-maintainers list if MAINTAINERS is supposed to be
authoritative?

It seems like this adds more confusion then anything else, since
now it's not obvious what should be considered the defacto standard
maintainer list.

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Maciej Soltysiak: "[PATCH] More C99 Initialisers in sound/*"
Previous message: Robert L. Harris: "Re: FINALLY caught a panic"
In reply to: Denis Vlasenko: "lk maintainers"
Next in thread: Matt Mackall: "kbuild (was Re: lk maintainers)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 22:00:28 EST