Re: Interactive Usage of 2.6.0.test1 worse than 2.4.21

From: William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com)
Date: Tue Aug 05 2003 - 00:16:31 EST


On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 07:04:22AM +0200, Martin Konold wrote:
> when using 2.6.0.test1 on a high end laptop (P-IV 2.2 GHz, 1GB RAM) I notice
> very significant slowdown in interactive usage compared to 2.4.21.
> The difference is most easily seen when switching folders in kmail. While
> 2.4.21 is instantaneous 2.6.0.test1 shows the clock for about 2-3 seconds.
> I am using maildir folders on reiserfs.
> Can anyone verify this behaviour?
> What other information do you need?

CPU profiles, e.g.
readprofile -n -m /boot/System.map-`uname -r` | sort -rn -k 1,1 | head -25

Also logs of vmstat 1.

-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 22:00:27 EST