On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 05:15, Antonio Vargas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 02:07:18AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > + if (!p->activated){
This is the relevent branch.
> Con, I will probably be wrong, but in [1] you are testing
> "activated != 0" and [2] is setting "activated = -1", which
> _is_ != 0 and thus would enter the "if->else" branch and
> do "activated = 1" in [3].
>
> Perhaps you meant to set "activated = 0" in [2]???
It looks for activated == 0 to decide if it should enter the branch and set it
to either 1 or 2.
> Note I've not read the rest of the scheduler code,
> so perhaps the "activated = 0" is in another place...
> just in case, I prefer asking.
Never hurts.
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 22:00:25 EST