On Thursday 31 July 2003 23:43, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
Hi William,
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:43:22AM +0200, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> > What makes me even more wondering is that 2.6.0-test1-wli tree does not
> > suck at all for interactivity where no scheduler changes were made.
> Could you make sure that you're not using 1A? (vanilla 1 and 1B are
> both fine for these purposes).
> Also, can I get a before/after of the following during an mp3 skip test?
> vmstat 1 | tee -a vmstat.log
> n=1; while true; do /usr/sbin/readprofile -n -m /boot/System.map-`uname -r`
> | sort -k 2,2 > profile.log.$n; n=$(( $n + 1 )); sleep 1; done
> If you could stop the logging shortly after the skip in the kernel that
> does skip (but not _too_ shortly after, give it at least 1 second) I
> would be much obliged. The "before" picture is most important. An
> "after" picture might also be helpful, but isn't strictly necessary.
Sure, I'll test it this weekend (mostly tomorrow). Stay tuned.
Thanks for your interest in fixing this.
ciao, Marc
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 22:00:16 EST