Re: [PATCH] sparse function pointer arguments now accept void pointers

From: Bernd Eckenfels (ecki-lmk@lina.inka.de)
Date: Thu Jul 31 2003 - 01:29:24 EST

Next message: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
Previous message: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
In reply to: Dave Olien: "[PATCH] sparse function pointer arguments now accept void pointers"
Next in thread: Dave Olien: "Re: [PATCH] sparse function pointer arguments now accept void pointers"
Reply: Dave Olien: "Re: [PATCH] sparse function pointer arguments now accept void pointers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In article <20030731052810.GA2853@osdl.org> you wrote:
> This patch eliminates warnings of the form:
...
> - if (t->type == SYM_PTR) {
> + if (t->type == SYM_PTR || t->type == SYM_FN) {

unlikely

Greetings
Bernd

-- 
eckes privat - http://www.eckes.org/
Project Freefire - http://www.freefire.org/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
Previous message: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
In reply to: Dave Olien: "[PATCH] sparse function pointer arguments now accept void pointers"
Next in thread: Dave Olien: "Re: [PATCH] sparse function pointer arguments now accept void pointers"
Reply: Dave Olien: "Re: [PATCH] sparse function pointer arguments now accept void pointers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:48 EST