Re: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches

From: Diego Calleja García (diegocg@teleline.es)
Date: Mon Jul 28 2003 - 12:06:18 EST

Next message: Phil Oester: "Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices"
Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: Does sysfs really provides persistent hardware path to devices?"
In reply to: Felipe Alfaro Solana: "Re: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches"
Next in thread: Con Kolivas: "Re: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

El Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:38:01 +0200 Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org> escribió:

>
> Well, for me now, the best scheduler is 2.6.0-test2 plus Con's O10
> patch.
>

I'm testing now test2-mm1 (which has O10) and yes, I must say that this
one feels GREAT

/me forgets old kernels forever.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Phil Oester: "Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices"
Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: Does sysfs really provides persistent hardware path to devices?"
In reply to: Felipe Alfaro Solana: "Re: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches"
Next in thread: Con Kolivas: "Re: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:36 EST