Re: [PATCH] nvidia nforce 1.0-261 nvnet for kernel 2.5

From: Rahul Karnik (rahul@genebrew.com)
Date: Sun Jul 27 2003 - 08:36:17 EST

Next message: Hans Reiser: "Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)"
Previous message: Francois Romieu: "Re: OT: Vanilla not for embedded?! Re: Kernel 2.6 size increase - get_current()?"
In reply to: Andrew de Quincey: "Re: [PATCH] nvidia nforce 1.0-261 nvnet for kernel 2.5"
Next in thread: Rahul Karnik: "Re: [PATCH] nvidia nforce 1.0-261 nvnet for kernel 2.5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Andrew de Quincey wrote:

> I've just dumped the mmapped IO space on mine. The MAC address shows up at
> offset 0xa8, but the amd8111e driver is looking for it at 0x160 (there's just
> loads of 0x00 there).

Also, as Marcelo -- no, not that one, the other one :) -- there is some
funky reversing of the MAC address needed. See the reverse loop in
nvnet.c where the MAC address is being read from the registers.

Thanks,
Rahul

-- Rahul Karnik rahul@genebrew.com

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Hans Reiser: "Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)"
Previous message: Francois Romieu: "Re: OT: Vanilla not for embedded?! Re: Kernel 2.6 size increase - get_current()?"
In reply to: Andrew de Quincey: "Re: [PATCH] nvidia nforce 1.0-261 nvnet for kernel 2.5"
Next in thread: Rahul Karnik: "Re: [PATCH] nvidia nforce 1.0-261 nvnet for kernel 2.5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:32 EST