On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 09:47, Robert L. Harris wrote:
>
> Thus spake Steven Cole (elenstev@mesatop.com):
[snippage]
> >
> > More exposition regarding top vs bottom posting: Replying at the bottom
> > results in an easily parseable tree. Consider the following conversation
> > where everyone replies at the bottom.
>
>
> On the other hand if everyone posted at the top it would be considerably
> easier reading for those who have been following the conversation
> without having to scroll down and figure out where comments and the
> conversation is at. You could read just the top post and go from there.
> For those new to the conversation they can just start at the bottom and
> scroll up. When the next post comes in they just read the top post
> again instead of scrolling down to the bottom or middle somewhere to
> figure out what/when/where.
>
> Using VI and Mutt, the cursor starts at the top not the bottom or
> anywhere in the middle so there's and ease of use for CLI mail readers
> as well instead of the GUI oriented.
>
>
> :wq!
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
Using a consistent agglutination policy results in more easily
understandable conversations. You've done a good job advocating top
posting, but until recently the linux-kernel norm was bottom posting.
The mix of the two is what is being objected to. Standards exist for
good reasons, and Tomas pointed out RFC 1855 and the lkml FAQ.
Please reply at the bottom. Thanks.
Steven
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:23 EST