Re: devfsd

From: Martin Schlemmer (
Date: Fri Jul 18 2003 - 00:57:24 EST

On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 17:56, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 04:46:10PM -0500, Ro0tSiEgE LKML wrote:
> > Why is devfsd still tagged as EXPERIMENTAL even in 2.6.0-test1 ? Is
> > there something wrong with it, or has it just not been changed?
> It's still there because we don't have a BROKEN tag.

Apart from obvious/known inefficiencies, it works fine over here :P

Any way, if you are serious, what make you consider it broken (no,
not talking about personal preferences/phobias 8)


Martin Schlemmer

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to More majordomo info at Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 22:00:32 EST