Re: what's left for 64 bit dev_t

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
Date: Wed Jul 16 2003 - 22:02:21 EST

Followup to: <20030716224838.GA3362@kroah.com>
By author: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 03:19:39PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > I expect we'll end up just jamming it in and seeing what happens.
>
> Sounds good to me :)
>
> I think the big problems will start to happen when people try to _use_
> the expanded namespace. Is LANANA set up to assign bigger numbers now?
> Are they going to carve them up into chunks? Or are we relying on
> userspace implementations like udev to handle the number management?
>

I suspect it will be a combination. In the short term I suspect John
Cagle (who is device@lanana) will fix the current glaring bogosities.

        -hpa 

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
If you send me mail in HTML format I will assume it's spam.
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 22:00:28 EST