Re: 2.6.0-test1-mm1

From: Andrew Morton (
Date: Wed Jul 16 2003 - 11:38:31 EST

William Lee Irwin III <> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 07:41:55AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> >> Oh, well that won't fly; it effectively isn't a constant initializer.
> >> I'll see what can be rammed past gcc. We're shooting for something
> >> with array element 0 equal to 0x1UL and all others 0.
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 08:02:07AM -0700, Barry K. Nathan wrote:
> > BTW, following my e-mail signature in this message is my .config. I
> > guess the most notable setting is that CONFIG_SMP is disabled (i.e.,
> > it's a UP compile).
> Hmm. Well, ditching the strong typechecking would "fix" it, though
> that's really only papering over it.

It doesn't _have_ to be initialised at compile time. Just stick a
little loop in init_IRQ()?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 22:00:25 EST