On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 07:38:44PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> No, please don't do this. There is no function at all in the cpufreq core
> which may be called with CPUFREQ_ALL_CPUS as arguments. Well, there had
> been, many months ago. But it really shall not be defined or used anywhere
> outside the 2.4. proc-intf any more.
ick, you're right of course.
> Now, wrt the ppc-cpufreq driver: benh's 2.5. tree includes a much more
> updated version than plain 2.6.0-test1 -- Ben, can you push that to Linus,
> please? Also, please change the line
> freqs.cpu = CPUFREQ_ALL_CPUS;
> in do_set_cpu_speed() to
> freqs.cpu = 0;
> which is the way it should be done now.
Ok, CPUFREQ_ALL_CPUS is no more in my pending tree.
Documentation/cpu-freq/core.txt is also out of date and could use
an update, but I'm not sure if its just that define thats out of date.
Care to give it a read through?
Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:59 EST