Re: [RFC/PATCH] sysfs'ify video4linux

• Next message: nick black: "Re: 2.6.0-test1-ac1 Matrox Compile Error"
• Previous message: Nicolas Turro: "Re: am-utils or kernel bug ? Seems to be kernel bug.. Any news ?"
• In reply to: Ronald Bultje: "Re: [RFC/PATCH] sysfs'ify video4linux"
• Next in thread: Greg KH: "Re: [RFC/PATCH] sysfs'ify video4linux"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 05:21:13PM +0200, Ronald Bultje wrote:
> Hey Gerd,
>
> On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 16:31, Gerd Knorr wrote:
> > This patch moves the video4linux subsystem from procfs to sysfs.
> [..cool stuff, especially the driver integration fanciness with the
> device struct stuff..]
> > Comments?
>
> Is /proc going away alltogether?

Well, it does need to provide per-process info like it was originally
intended. It's all the device crap that doesn't belong there that is
moving.

Regards,

-- 
Matt Porter
mporter@kernel.crashing.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: nick black: "Re: 2.6.0-test1-ac1 Matrox Compile Error"
• Previous message: Nicolas Turro: "Re: am-utils or kernel bug ? Seems to be kernel bug.. Any news ?"
• In reply to: Ronald Bultje: "Re: [RFC/PATCH] sysfs'ify video4linux"
• Next in thread: Greg KH: "Re: [RFC/PATCH] sysfs'ify video4linux"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:58 EST