2.6.0-test1 and second 3c509

From: Pete Clements (clem@clem.clem-digital.net)
Date: Tue Jul 15 2003 - 10:13:27 EST


Just a reminder, I'm still backing out the 2.5.71 3c509 changes to get
my second 3c509 card. Glad to test.

Quoting viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 09:52:01AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> > From: Pete Clements <clem@clem.clem-digital.net>
> > Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 12:50:25 -0400 (EDT)
> >
> > >From boot log:
> >
> > Kernel command line: auto BOOT_IMAGE=Linux ro root=341 ether=9,0x310,4,0x3c509,eth1
> >
> > Yes, that explains why the second card isn't found.
> >
> > The problem is:
> >
> > 1) the we can't assign a name to the device
> > until we've registered it with the networking
> >
> > 2) without a name the boot argument lookup doesn't work
> >
> > 3) we have to register the device with the networking only
> > after it is initialized
> >
> > Hmmm...
>
> Crap. AFAICS, the clean solution would be to pass these guys (blah_probe())
> expected device name. And let them do allocation, etc., themselves.
>
> Looking into it...
>

-- 
Pete Clements 

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:57 EST