Re: sizeof (siginfo_t) problem

From: Andreas Schwab (schwab@suse.de)
Date: Mon Jul 14 2003 - 10:02:26 EST


Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> writes:

|> Jakub Jelinek wrote:
|> > When siginfo_t was added, the intent obviously was that its size
|> > be 128 bytes on all arches.
|> >
|> > The kernel unfortunately does this right on sparc64 and alpha from 64-bit
|> > arches only; ia64, s390x, ppc64 etc. got it wrong.
|>
|> That's not the only siginfo_t problem:
|>
|> - Take a look at the placement of the _uid32 field on m68k.
|> It varies from sub-structure to sub-structure - yet it is
|> always written to the same offset by the kernel. Borken!

It should probably use the one from asm-generic as well. I could not
find anything that actually uses that field.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:52 EST