Re: Bug in open() function (?)

From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sat Jul 12 2003 - 01:14:43 EST

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: Linux 2.4.22-pre5"
Previous message: David Mosberger: "Re: utimes/futimes/lutimes syscalls"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: Bug in open() function (?)"
Next in thread: Andries Brouwer: "Re: Bug in open() function (?)"
Reply: Andries Brouwer: "Re: Bug in open() function (?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 22:23:00 PDT, Andrew Morton said:

> We've lived with it for this long.

Well... you have a point there..

> Given that the behaviour is undefined, the behaviour which we should
> implement is clearly "whatever 2.4 is doing". So let's leave it alone.

I suppose I could live with that *IF* somebody fixes 'man 2 open' to
reflect reality.

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: Linux 2.4.22-pre5"
Previous message: David Mosberger: "Re: utimes/futimes/lutimes syscalls"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: Bug in open() function (?)"
Next in thread: Andries Brouwer: "Re: Bug in open() function (?)"
Reply: Andries Brouwer: "Re: Bug in open() function (?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:43 EST