Right. Waiting for more results.
Please always forawrd lkml okay?
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Jim Gifford wrote:
> It locked up last night, but no error information. But I did notice a
> massive memory leak. I will follow up on that today, (756MB).
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marcelo Tosatti" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: "Jim Gifford" <email@example.com>
> Cc: <firstname.lastname@example.org>; "Andrea Arcangeli" <email@example.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 5:56 AM
> Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.22-pre3
> > y
> > On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Jim Gifford wrote:
> > > I have a question, look at the buffers. Should the buffers be increasing
> > > this manner??
> > I think its correct - its just caching more data after time passes.
> > RIel, Andrea?
> > >
> > > When I started the system this was my reading
> > >
> > > top - 01:39:10 up 5 min, 1 user, load average: 3.70, 1.78, 0.72
> > > Tasks: 106 total, 3 running, 103 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
> > > Cpu0 : 30.8% user, 13.5% system, 55.8% nice, 0.0% idle
> > > Cpu1 : 39.7% user, 18.6% system, 41.7% nice, 0.0% idle
> > > Mem: 1033896k total, 195548k used, 838348k free, 7188k buffers
> > > Swap: 265060k total, 0k used, 265060k free, 45132k cached
> > >
> > > Here is my current reading after being up 13 hours.
> > >
> > > top - 14:41:57 up 13:06, 2 users, load average: 2.92, 3.26, 3.11
> > > Tasks: 118 total, 5 running, 113 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
> > > Cpu0 : 32.5% user, 10.8% system, 56.7% nice, 0.0% idle
> > > Cpu1 : 27.4% user, 12.1% system, 60.5% nice, 0.0% idle
> > > Mem: 1033672k total, 577568k used, 456104k free, 137452k buffers
> > > Swap: 265060k total, 0k used, 265060k free, 167232k cached
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:40 EST