On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 07:27:13PM +0300, Mika Liljeberg wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 18:43, CaT wrote:
> > ip tunnel add sit1 mode sit remote 138.25.6.14
> > ip link set sit1 up
> > ip addr add 3ffe:8001:000c:ffff::37/127 dev sit1
> > ip route add ::/0 via 3ffe:8001:000c:ffff::36
> > RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
>
> Try this:
>
> ip route add ::/0 dev sit1
That didn't complain but pings to the ext gw were broken. Noticed the
route contained:
3ffe:8001:c:ffff::36/127 via :: dev sit1 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1480 adv
mss 1420
And having remembered /127 being mentioned as bad I changed the
interface config to a netmask of /64. Dropped it and brought it
up and it all works.
There's something fundamental about ipv6 netmasks that I just don't
understand...
-- "How can I not love the Americans? They helped me with a flat tire the other day," he said. - http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/artikkel?SearchID=73139162287496&Avis=TO&Dato=20030624&Kategori=NEWS28&Lopenr=106240111&Ref=AR - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:37 EST