Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked

From: Mika Penttilä (mika.penttila@kolumbus.fi)
Date: Thu Jul 10 2003 - 14:57:12 EST


But 3ffe:8001:000c:ffff::36 is _not_ subnet routers anycast address. Anyway, looks like a bug to me...

--Mika

YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ???? wrote:

>In article <20030710154302.GE1722@zip.com.au> (at Fri, 11 Jul 2003 01:43:03 +1000), CaT <cat@zip.com.au> says:
>
>
>
>>With 2.4.21-pre2 I can get a nice tunnel going over my ppp connection
>>and as such get ipv6 connectivity. I think went to 2.4.21 and then to
>>2.4.22-pre4 and bringing up the tunnel fails as follows:
>>
>>
>:
>
>
>>ip addr add 3ffe:8001:000c:ffff::37/127 dev sit1
>> ip route add ::/0 via 3ffe:8001:000c:ffff::36
>>RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
>>
>>
>
>This is not bug, but rather misconfiguration;
>you cannot use prefix::, which is mandatory subnet routers
>anycast address, as unicast address.
>
>Thank you.
>
>
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:36 EST