On Thursday 10 July 2003 11:27, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Could you try the following?
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:42:35AM +0200, Thomas Schlichter wrote:
> OK, I tried it. For me it compiles!
> But the size of the resulting objectfile's text section is about 64bytes
> larger than with my patch. So it seems that gcc3.3 wasn't able to optimize
> away all the unneeded stuff...
> And I don't think my patch is that ugly, but hey, it's your decision...
64B? Why do you care?
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:34 EST