Re: 2.5.74-mm3 - module-init-tools: necessary to replace root copies?

From: Andrew Morton (akpm@osdl.org)
Date: Thu Jul 10 2003 - 03:23:12 EST

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: RFC: what's in a stable series?"
Previous message: Frederick, Fabian: "Changelog request"
In reply to: Piet Delaney: "Re: 2.5.74-mm3 - module-init-tools: necessary to replace root copies?"
Next in thread: Thomas Schlichter: "Re: 2.5.74-mm3 - apm_save_cpus() Macro still bombs out"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Piet Delaney <piet@www.piet.net> wrote:
>
> Also, do you think it's better to enable the use
> frame pointer when using kgdb.

Enabled, definitely.

> In the past I thought
> I had problems with modules due to my enabling the
> frame pointer being used.

No, there are no such problems.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: RFC: what's in a stable series?"
Previous message: Frederick, Fabian: "Changelog request"
In reply to: Piet Delaney: "Re: 2.5.74-mm3 - module-init-tools: necessary to replace root copies?"
Next in thread: Thomas Schlichter: "Re: 2.5.74-mm3 - apm_save_cpus() Macro still bombs out"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:34 EST