On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Nick Piggin wrote:
> I agree some people have some inflated ideas about a desktop workload,
> but I'd just point out that if your mp3 player was using say 2% CPU,
> it should be able to preempt the make soon after it becomes runnable,
> and not have to wait at the end of the queue. It would become a CPU
> hog itself if you had 48 other processes running though.
This is clearly true, actually even more since player usually suck way
less than 2% of the CPU. If no video is involved, they simply do a write()
to /dev/dsp and then they sync by calling GETOSPACE and sleeping in the
"hope" to be wake up almost in time. I never said that the scheduler
should not be fixed. It definitely has to.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:27 EST