On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 ahorn@deorth.org wrote:
>
> On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, David Schwartz wrote:
>
> >Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 14:45:35 -0700
> >From: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
> >To: Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>, Fluke <fluke@gibson.mw.luc.edu>
> >Cc: linux-poweredge@dell.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> >Subject: RE: Dell vs. GPL
> >
> >
> >> First since it effects ATA it is my issue for the most part.
> >> You have no stake or issue to pursue GPL violations if there are any.
> >
> > False. He is an intended third party beneficiary of the GPL.
> >
>
> As I understood it, only the copyright holder of the code could pursue GPL
> violations. I believe the FSF will give help to anyone who wishes to
> pursue such action for 'the little guys' out there.
BAWHAHAHAHA
Only if you assign copyright to FSF and they control you works, correction
"their works" now.
Been there, got burned and no tshirt.
Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 30 2003 - 22:00:32 EST