Re: [PATCH][RFC] irq handling code consolidation (common part)

From: Miles Bader (miles@lsi.nec.co.jp)
Date: Fri Jun 27 2003 - 01:04:13 EST

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH][2.4] more atm updates backported from 2.5"
Previous message: Marc-Christian Petersen: "Re: Linux 2.4.22-pre2"
In reply to: Andrey Panin: "Re: [PATCH][RFC] irq handling code consolidation (common part)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Andrey Panin <pazke@donpac.ru> writes:
> BTW sparc implementation of irq_itoa() uses static buffer for the formatted
> string, is it really irq/preempt safe ?

Passinf in a result buffer seems simplest (maybe have the arch define a
macro for the max-length).

[btw the name `irq_itoa' seems a bit odd; how about `irq_name' (or
`irq_rep' for clu-lovers)?]

-miLes

-- 
Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it
has to be us.  -- Jerry Garcia
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH][2.4] more atm updates backported from 2.5"
Previous message: Marc-Christian Petersen: "Re: Linux 2.4.22-pre2"
In reply to: Andrey Panin: "Re: [PATCH][RFC] irq handling code consolidation (common part)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 30 2003 - 22:00:25 EST