Re: 4 is good. .00000001% is good.

From: Kurt Wall (kwall@kurtwerks.com)
Date: Tue Jun 24 2003 - 18:44:18 EST

Next message: jds: "Re: Kernel Panic in 2.5.73-mm1 OOps part."
Previous message: Stephan von Krawczynski: "Re: Undo aic7xxx changes (now rc7+aic20030603)"
In reply to: Kurt Wall: "Re: 4 is good. .00000001% is good."
Next in thread: Mike Galbraith: "Re: 4 is good. .00000001% is good."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Quoth Kurt Wall:
> Quoth Rick A. Hohensee:

[...]

> > ioctls. With more teeth than Torvalds. Just don't leave it where I might
> > get a whiff of it.
>
> I think I shall send your messages to a location where I might get
> a whiff of them.
>
> *plonk*

Or, rather, where I might *not* get a whiff of them. Sheesh.

-- 
"I only touch base with reality on an as-needed basis!"
		-- Royal Floyd Mengot (Klaus)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: jds: "Re: Kernel Panic in 2.5.73-mm1 OOps part."
Previous message: Stephan von Krawczynski: "Re: Undo aic7xxx changes (now rc7+aic20030603)"
In reply to: Kurt Wall: "Re: 4 is good. .00000001% is good."
Next in thread: Mike Galbraith: "Re: 4 is good. .00000001% is good."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 30 2003 - 22:00:17 EST