Re: [BK-CVS gateway] version tags

From: Larry McVoy (
Date: Wed Jun 11 2003 - 09:47:31 EST

I'll go look. CVS takes way too long to tag, it forces a rewrite of
every file. I did attempt to filter out tags that weren't of the forn
v2.* but it looks like I screwed up.

On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 04:44:37PM +0200, Pascal Schmidt wrote:
> Hi!
> I noticed both the 2.4 and 2.5 BK->CVS trees don't have version tags
> any more (v2_5_70, for example, as in the old tree).
> Is this intentional? Did CVS take too long to tag all files or something?
> It was quite a nice feature to have them, very useful for finding out the
> differences between certain kernel versions. I can live without it,
> though. It's still a nice service without the tags. (Thanks!)
> --
> Ciao,
> Pascal

Larry McVoy              lm at
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 22:00:28 EST