Re: IDE IRQ probe brokenness.

From: Russell King (
Date: Tue Jun 10 2003 - 13:37:50 EST

On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 05:42:41PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Basically we need a "NOT_AN_IRQ" value defined either globally or per
> port

All it needs is for someone to add the definition for NO_IRQ to all
architecture header files. ARM has an established use of NO_IRQ
already with currently 34 uses:

 * Use this value to indicate lack of interrupt
 * capability
#ifndef NO_IRQ
#define NO_IRQ ((unsigned int)(-1))

I'd prefer not to do another mindless time wasteful change just because
someone decides to use a different name.

Russell King (                The developer of ARM Linux

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to More majordomo info at Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 22:00:24 EST