On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 22:14, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> --On Monday, June 09, 2003 22:08:42 +0200 Felipe Alfaro Solana <email@example.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 20:51, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> >> >> If you don't nice the hell out of X, does it work OK?
> >> > No.
> >> >
> >> > The way I reproduce the sound skips:
> >> > run xmms, run evolution, compose a mail with gpg.
> >> > on mm6 the gpg part stops the sound for a few seconds. (with X -10 and 0)
> >> > on mm5 xmms plays without stops. (with X -10)
> >> Does this (from Ingo?) do anything useful to it?
> > I can confirm that 2.5.70-mm6 with Ingo's patch and HZ set back to 1000
> > is nearly perfect (it still takes some seconds for the scheduler to
> > adjust dynamic priorities).
> OK ... sorry to be pedantic, but I want to nail this down.
> It's still broken with HZ=1000, but without Ingo's patch, right?
Well, Ingo's patch makes XMMS more resistant to audio skip when HZ=1000.
Anyways, with HZ=1000 interactivity is much better than with HZ=100
(with or without Ingo's patch).
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 22:00:23 EST